April 15, 2008

CaTubes Sucks - Tattles on his buyers!

Filed under: Music — Phillip Holmes @ 3:13 pm

Received my 2 NOS RCA 5751 tubes via CaTubes (an eBay Power Seller).

The tubes weren’t for me and had more of a tele tone than I wanted. Now here is the rub. I contacted CaTubes and let him know I was not 100% happy with the tubes and showed him that I re-listed them on eBay. I used the photo he used figuring ‘what use could he have for a photo of tubes that he had just sold to me? Right?’.

I guess that either out of hurt feelings that I didn’t like his tubes or I was selling the tubes I bought from him at no reserve, CaTubes reported me to eBay for using the photo he took of the tubes for his listing. eBay promptly took my listing down and I lost my listing fee! I didn’t even get a return email from him that said ’sorry you didn’t dig the tubes’ or anything of that sort. Just a report to eBay that I used his picture.

So in summary, I lost my listing fees due to the fact that CaTubes didn’t have the common courtesy to simply email me and request I take my own photo.

It is my estimation that the person at CaTubes that reported me is a vindictive, petty, anally retentive, small little man that has very little to do with this time.

Do yourself a favor and don’t do business with CaTubes!

January 21, 2008

The TrueBone Band - “Foolish Pride”

Filed under: Music — Phillip Holmes @ 12:45 pm

January 9, 2008

The TrueBone Band - Lets Stay Together!

Filed under: ColdFusion — Phillip Holmes @ 11:25 pm

August 11, 2007

Clear Link Between Environmental Toxins and Autism

Filed under: Parenthood, Autism, Environmental News — Phillip Holmes @ 10:49 am

“Original post by Contra Costa Times and software by Elliott Back”

AS A physician who specializes in treating autism and the mother of an autistic child, I would like to express my opposition to the viewpoint in Dr. Rahul Parikh’s editorial, “Junk science vs. real thing in autism trial.”
Parikh implies that the research showing a link between autism and vaccines is wrong and that the vaccine preservative Thimerisol (which is about 50 percent mercury) is safe.

It is no surprise that pediatricians as a group have been slow to acknowledge the evidence that vaccines may play a role in the causation of autism in some children.

After all, it is pediatricians who administer those vaccines. Many vaccines still contain Thimerisol, although it is less now than in the peak mercury years — the decade of the ’90s.

No one questions that pregnant and nursing women should avoid mercury pollution, seafood containing mercury and should not have dental work involving amalgam silver-colored fillings, which are also about 50 percent mercury.

But some doctors still say that injecting a pregnant woman or a newborn baby with a mercury-containing vaccine is OK.

Many toxins are implicated in the causation of autism, not just mercury, but it is certainly one of the worst.

Veterinarians realized how toxic Thimerisol is and removed it from animal vaccines years ago.

There are significant differences in how people react to the same toxin. A good example is cigarette smoking.

Some people who smoke get lung cancer, but others will get emphysema or heart disease. Not everyone who is exposed to mercury and other toxins will become autistic.
Genetic predisposition, timing of exposure, amount of exposure and type of exposure all interact to produce a unique symptom complex.

Toxins also have been implicated in the causation of ADD, sensory integration problems, and language and learning disorders, among other things.

One in six children now has some sort of neurologic problem. If that is not an epidemic, I don’t know what is.

Most of the studies claiming that vaccines are not related to autism were done by researchers with financial ties to vaccine manufacturers — a clear conflict of interest.

Most of those studies are epidemiological studies done on large populations that could easily miss an issue that affects about 1 in 150 children.

Epidemiological studies are retrospective and are the easiest type of research to manipulate statistics to get the outcome you want.

The designs of those studies were extremely flawed, as the group SafeMinds has clearly shown.

The science showing direct harm on a cellular level from Thimerisol is biological, prospective science and has been done by many fine upstanding clinicians and scientists who have risked their careers to publish unpopular findings.

The link between toxic exposure and autism is clear, not only from the science that shows it, but also because the treatments that address that exposure and its many consequences improve the level of functioning of autistic children.

Unfortunately, families of autistic children are victimized twice — first from the poisonings that damaged their child, and then from the doctors who misinform their patients that there is no science behind treatments that work.

There are huge financial and political forces against this truth because the liability and the stakes are so high. What gets lost are the needs of the affected families who struggle with heartbreak every day under incredibly difficult circumstances, with very little help from the government and insurance industry, and often even their doctors.

Mielke is a physician in Pleasanton.

August 4, 2007

Glutathione and Autism - The Common Denominator

Filed under: Parenthood, Autism, Environmental News — Phillip Holmes @ 7:45 pm

Scientists at UT Southwestern Medical Center in Dallas and Immunotec Research Ltd. have initiated a study in which a specially formulated whey protein isolate (Immunocal)will be used to raise glutathione levels in an attempt to lessen symptoms of autism.

Autism is a neurological developmental disorder that affects children’s ability to socialize normally, impairs language skills, restricts their interests and curiosity and causes other behavioral abnormalities. Most cases are diagnosed before three years of age, and there has been an alarming increase in the number of cases diagnosed over the past two decades. Currently, 1 in every 150 (1 in 96 boys) American children is being identified as having autism, and these numbers are on the rise each year. To date, medical treatment of this disorder has been minimally effective.

Although the causes of autism have not been clearly identified, research has suggested that chronic biochemical imbalance plays a role. Studies have shown that levels of the major intracellular antioxidant “Glutathione” is typically about 50% lower in children with autism. Glutathione, which is produced by every cell in the body, is responsible for a number of functions including removing or neutralizing dangerous substances that we are exposed to on a daily basis, including toxic metals. Toxins, pollution, disease, stress, and poor diet can all contribute to loss of glutathione. When glutathione levels reach a critically low degree, we are much more vulnerable to toxins and immune dysfunction.

Principal investigator for this study is Dr. Janet Kern, an adjunct assistant professor of psychiatry at UT Southwestern, which is internationally recognized for its clinical and research programs.

“Some children with autism are poor detoxifiers relative to normally developing children, and in particular, have trouble excreting toxic metals,” said Dr. Kern. “Toxic metals that are not eliminated may build up in the brain. Plasma glutathione has been found to be lower in children with autism, particularly, in children with autism who have regressed. We want to clearly establish that raising glutathione levels in these children will improve their ability to detoxify these substances and in that way improve some of their symptoms.”

Dr. Jill James, Professor of Pediatrics at University of Arkansas for Medical Sciences, will be a co-investigator. Dr. James is noted for her landmark studies in autism and toxicology and is among the first scientists to point out the links with low glutathione levels. ” We know that Immunocal has been used to raise glutathione in other studies very effectively in areas such as cancer and lung disease. We want to take advantage of this same technology”, stated James.

The team will be using a protein supplement produced by Immunotec Research Ltd. near Montreal, Quebec, Canada, called “Immunocal”. It is identified by the Physicians’ Desk Reference (PDR) as a glutathione precursor. Immunotec Research Ltd. has combined rigorous research and business acumen delivering natural healthcare and dietary supplements in 22 countries worldwide.

IMMUNOTEC RESEARCH LTD.
http://www.immunotec.com/

August 3, 2007

Don’t Buy From Musicians Advocate - Worst Customer Service Ever!

Filed under: Music — Phillip Holmes @ 11:25 pm

I had a horrible time with this guy (Brad).
Buyer beware!!! IF you do business with Musicians Advocate, be prepared for the worst.

My purchase of an Art TCS started out as a regular old eBay purchase and turned into a nightmare. Do not buy from these people. They have the absolute worst customer service I have ever experienced.

The owner’s name and city of residence, seems to be:

Bradley L Hagen
Las Vegas, NV 89102 United States

July 17th, 2007:

I purchased the item from Musicians Advocate on eBay and accidentally sent an eCheck through PayPal instead of a direct draft. Realizing I had made an honest mistake, I looked up the 800 number listed in the eBay auction item. Upon calling their advertised 800 number, the answering machine informed me that Musicians Advocate no longer provided phone support for their clients and the 800 number was no specifically for their vendors only. That is when I got worried.

I simply wanted to but the item again via a credit card and have them refund my original purchase once paypal sent through the eCheck.

After several days of abusive emails from Brad / his company that offered no resolution to re-checking out, my e-Check finally cleared and he refunded my account. When he found out that I filed a BBB complaint on him, Brad opened a unpaid item dispute with eBay AFTER he refunded my $233.50. Again, I went to eBay’s Safeharbor and they assure me action was taken. I recommended for eBay to strip Musicians Advocate of their power seller status and told them they should kick sellers like this. Musicians Advocate uses the eBay system against their customers, have horrible customer support, advertise support 800 numbers that are answered by a machine that tells you that the number is no longer used for client support and lie about unpaid items after they refund you. I have found several other eBayers that Brad has done this to in order to coerce them into changing their eBay rating.

This Brad person is obviously a very immature individual and if you cause him any extra effort, be prepared for the worst scenario.

Brad finally delete the bogus unpaid item report and he and I had some pretty harsh words over email. He also sent a very childish response to me through the BBB (which I couldnt believe he did due to the fact that they see it). It was literally the most moronic scribblings I’ve ever read. I’ll post it soon as a JPG.
This guy is obviously not customer service oriented and Lord help you if anything goes wrong with your order. What is very obvious to me is that if he didn’t blackmail / coerce people into removing their negative eBay comments, he would never be a power seller.

Buyer Beware of Musicians Advocate!

August 2, 2007

Study suggests link between environmental mercury, autism

Filed under: Parenthood, Autism, Environmental News — Phillip Holmes @ 2:52 pm

A study by researchers at The University of Texas Health Science Center at San Antonio reveals a multiple-digits increase in the rate of autism for every 1,000 pounds of mercury released environmentally in Texas counties.

The study does not prove causation of autism by mercury, researchers are quick to point out.

The study compared mercury totals reported for 2001 in the 254 Texas counties to the rate of autism and special education services in nearly 1,200 Texas school districts. The districts, which range from urban to small metro to rural, enroll 4 million Texas children.

“The main finding is that for every 1,000 pounds of environmentally released mercury, we saw a 17 percent increase in autism rates,” said lead author Raymond F. Palmer, Ph.D., associate professor in the Health Science Center’s department of family and community medicine.

Large-scale mercury exposures such as accidental spills long have been implicated with developmental disabilities, but this study is among the first to examine the relationship between potentially chronic, low-dose mercury exposure and a developmental disorder such as autism, Dr. Palmer said.

Mercury is the third-most frequently found toxic substance nationwide, after arsenic and lead. Coal-burning power plants, which supply energy to cities and generally are in close proximity to population centers, release more mercury than any other source in the United States. Texas is fourth among the states in reported mercury releases, after California, Oregon and West Virginia.

Using statistical modeling, the researchers showed that increases in the rate of special education services were associated with higher mercury release levels. However, “it is the increase in autism that explains this relationship” in Texas, Dr. Palmer said.

The authors cautioned that the study is an ecological investigation based on county level and school district data. This type of study does not lend itself to interpretation at the level of the individual. This is only a first step in identifying areas for further investigation. The study also does not assess changes in mercury levels over time as a predictor of rates of change in developmental disorders. While the current study precludes causal interpretation, the team is working on a second report that will investigate the longitudinal association between mercury and autism rates.

Autism is a developmental disorder that varies in severity in individuals and is characterized by impaired ability to engage in normal social behavior and by behavior patterns such as repetitive motions and sounds. Autism is estimated to occur in as many as 1 in 200 children and is reported to be rising in prevalence, although statistics vary.

The study authors note that the new research “has implications for toxic substance regulation and prevention policies. The effects of differing state policies regarding toxic release of mercury on the incidence of developmental disorders should be investigated.”

The study is published in the peer-reviewed journal Health & Place, an Elsevier Ltd publication. Co-authors are Claudia S. Miller, M.D., from the department of family and community medicine at the Health Science Center; Zachary Stein from San Antonio; Stephen Blanchard, Ph.D., of the department of sociology at Our Lady of the Lake University; and David Mandell, Ph.D., of the University of Pennsylvania’s Center for Mental Health Policy and Services Research

July 30, 2007

The Filthy Five - Chlorine Manufactures

Filed under: Parenthood, Autism, Environmental News — Phillip Holmes @ 9:24 pm

Preface:

The CDC is about to update their stats from 1 in 96 boys to 1 in 80 boys diagnosed as on the ASD spectrum. Today, 1 in 6 children are being diagnosed with issues such as ADD, ADHD, Autism, language delays, and many other neurological disorders. I firmly believe that a large majority of these staggering numbers are due to our children being affected by pollution in the environment, to one degree or another.

This study, performed in San Antonio Text in 2005 by Claudia Miller, M.D.. found that “for every thousand pounds of environmentally released mercury, we saw a 17 percent increase in autism rates”.

Oceana Report:

Source: Oceana

Full Report

Mercury Fact Sheet

Oceana has published the most extensive report to date focusing on the conversion of mercury-cell chlorine factories to more environmentally and economically sound mercury-free technology. The report shows that shifting has major economic benefits to the companies.

Key Findings

Both the ERCO plant in Wisconsin and the Olin plant in Tennessee are the number one mercury air polluters in their states, while Olin in Georgia and Ashta in Ohio are the third largest source of mercury air pollution in their respective states. PPG in West Virginia emits nearly twice as much mercury as the average power plant.

If the five plants eliminated mercury use in chlorine production, nearly 4,400 pounds of reported mercury emissions could be eliminated each year. This does not include mercury that is “lost” and not monitored at the plant, an amount estimated to rival releases from power plants in certain years.

Although the cost of converting to mercury-free technology runs in the millions of dollars (as detailed in the report), analysis shows the majority of costs would be recovered within five years from energy savings, increased capacity and eliminating millions of dollars in mercury-related fines, upgrades and treatment costs.

Plants that have shifted see increases in energy efficiency between 25 and 37 percent. Since electricity can make up half of total production costs, this can vastly improve profitability.
Many plants also have increased production capacity by approximately 25 percent in the process of converting to mercury-free technology.

Some of the Filthy Five have argued that mercury use is necessary to create high quality caustic soda which is required for some manufacturing processes like producing rayon, a human-made fiber. However, mercury-free technology is now being used to create high quality caustic soda and is being used to produce rayon in India. Additionally, rayon is no longer manufactured in the United States.

Chlorine Factories: Still Major Sources of Mercury Pollution

Mercury has been used in chlorine and caustic soda production for more than one-hundred years. Technology that eliminates the need to use mercury in chlor-alkali production has been readily available for just as long. Yet, in the United States, five chlor-alkali plants have still not committed to stop using the outdated mercury-cell technology to produce their products. In 2005, these five plants reported emissions of more than 4,400 pounds of mercury into the air. On average, these plants release more than four times the average amount of mercury released from a typical power plant; earning them the title “The Filthy Five.”

3c7b26aaf7.jpg

ddec13a238.jpg

Mercury-free technology has been readily available and in use around the world for decades. Already, 90 percent of the chlorine produced in the United States is made using mercury-free technology. Many plants were constructed using either diaphragm or membrane-cell technology. However, many others were built to use mercury. Of those, more than one-hundred mercury-cell chlor-alkali plants already have switched or plan to switch to mercury-free technology around the globe. This analysis has identified 115 such facilities, making it the most comprehensive compilation of this information to date. However, some plants undoubtedly have been converted that were not identified in this analysis.

Take Action!

Even though switching to mercury-free technology is good for the bottom line, the Filthy Five are still refusing to leave 19th century technology behind. Oceana’s local organizers and e-activists will help show these companies that it is time to become responsible corporate citizens.
Get involved!

July 15, 2007

America’s Dirtiest Power Plants - Huge Methylmercury Contributors

Filed under: Parenthood, Autism — Phillip Holmes @ 3:35 pm

Methylmercury is a neurotoxin. If you compare the symptoms of autism, they’re strikingly similar to that of mercury poisoning. Mercury has a blood half life of anywhere between 40-160 days (opinions vary). Mercury in the environment never degrades, ever.

Autism and mercury poisoning damage the: brain/nerve cells; eyes; immune system; gastrointestinal system; muscle control; and the speech center.

This study, performed in San Antonio Text in 2005 by Claudia Miller, M.D.. found that “for every thousand pounds of environmentally released mercury, we saw a 17 percent increase in autism rates”.

Full article about dirty plants attached here:

America’s Dirtiest Power Plants

My comments are below the snippet from the article link.—-

“According to the Toxics Release Inventory (TRI), power plants released 45.6 tons of mercury
emissions in 2001, the latest year for which data is available.7 The top 50 mercury polluters
account for 43 percent of mercury emissions from the entire power sector. [See Figure 3]
Interestingly, the TRI data indicates that the (currently unregulated) mining industry and other
industrial sectors are also significant sources of mercury. 8

Mercury is a highly toxic metal that, once released into the atmosphere, settles in lakes and
rivers, where it moves up the food chain to humans. In 2003, the Centers for Disease Control
found that roughly 10 percent of American women carry mercury concentrations at levels
considered to put a fetus at risk to neurological damage.9

Many of the Top 50 Dirtiest Power Plants Have Been In Court or Under
Investigation, Only to be Let off the Hook by the Bush Administration
Enforcing existing clean air laws would go a long way toward cleaning up the dirtiest power
plants. A total of 89 power plants made it onto one or more of the three “Top 50” rankings.
Forty seven of these 89 plants, more than half, have either been sued or placed under
investigation by EPA for violating the Clean Air Act’s New Source Review requirement.10 Of
the top 50 SO2 emitters, 18 plants have been brought to court and another 11 were placed under
investigation by the government. Appendix I shows which of these companies have either been
sued or placed under investigation by EPA. The chart also shows the plant owners and location
of each facility.

In August 2003, the electric utility industry received its much sought after windfall when the
Bush administration decided to relax the rules for New Source Review, exempting many
facilities from the law’s permit and pollution control requirements. Four months later, the
Washington D.C. Circuit Court stayed the rules, questioning their legality and placing the NSR
program in limbo.

Nonetheless, the result of the Administration’s policy is that many power plants—those already
in court as well as those under investigation — have have either had the cases against them
undermined or simply dropped by the Bush Administration. While the Administration and the
Courts decide the fate of the NSR program, power plants delay meaningful pollution control.
For example, the W. H. Sammis plant in Ohio, currently in court, increased its SO2 emissions
from approximately 145,000 tons in 2002 to 164,000 tons in 2003.”
—-
My comments:

Texas has eight of the worst 50 plants, contributing 7218 lbs. of mercury into the environment per year. With that said, Governor Perry (R) is trying to fast track 17 more dirty plants through state licensing. Luckily, those plants are being met by environmental groups that are pushing for clean burning coal technologies.

NRP Blasts Rick Perry Over New Dirty Plants


So, lets do the math:

Texas has 268,601 square miles which represents 7.5% of the total land mass of the US. However, it contributes roughly 18.1% of the US mercury pollution (released by the top 50 worst power plants). Our leaders have done a great job protecting us, haven’t they?

Texas emissions in 2001. I am fairly positive that since ‘this administration’ discards EPA and judicial oversight, these numbers have increased over the last six years:

Rank Location lbs of Mercury Per Year
3 Monticello TX 1,303
6 H W Pirkey TX 1,100
7 Limestone TX 1,100
8 Martin Lake TX 1,070
13 W A Parish TX 880
27 O W Sommers/J TDeely/J K Spruce TX 703
36 Sam Seymour TX 615
43 Welsh Power Plant TX 510
8 of 50 dirty plants contributing 7281 lbs of 38,874 lbs Total US Mercury

July 7, 2007

Vaccines may fuel autism epidemic

Filed under: Parenthood, Autism — Phillip Holmes @ 1:20 pm

Report: U.S. infants exposed to mercury beyond EPA, FDA limits

——————————————————————————–
Posted: June 9, 2003
Source: www.worldnetdaily.com
5:00 p.m. Eastern

According to data provided by the U.S. Department of Education, the increased autism rate in California is in line with the increases other states are experiencing. For example, in 1992 Ohio reported 22 cases. A decade later the number had increased by 13,895 percent to 3,057. In Illinois the rate of autism cases climbed from just five in 1992 to 3,802 - an increase of 76,040 percent.

Mississippi, New Hampshire and the District of Columbia reported no cases of autism in 1992, but by 2002 the number of cases reported were 461, 404 and 144, respectively.

Only Puerto Rico can claim to have an increase of less than 100 percent, with the remaining states reporting increases of at least 500 percent during the same period.

Although once considered rare, during the last two decades the chance of a child being diagnosed with autism has skyrocketed from one in 10,000 to one in 150. In California, full-syndrome autism now is the No. 1 disability among children and more prevalent than childhood cancer, diabetes and Down’s syndrome. It is estimated that within the next four years autism cases in the Golden State will exceed the total number of cases of both cerebral palsy and epilepsy. To get a better idea of how quickly the epidemic is spreading one need only consider that in 1987 there were 2,778 persons with autism in California. By 2002 the number had increased to 20,377, and in 2002 3,575 new cases had been added to the rolls, far exceeding the total number of cases in the state 15 years earlier.

For years there has been a debate about the cause or causes of autism, but the vast majority of finger-pointing has been directed at childhood vaccines as the culprit. And considering what is put into the vaccines injected into hours-old infants, it is easy to understand why they are at the top of the list of suspects: formaldehyde (used in embalming), thimerosal (nearly 50 percent mercury), aluminum phosphate (toxic and carcinogenic), antibiotics, phenols (corrosive to skin and toxic), aluminum salts (corrosive to tissue and neurotoxic), methanol (toxic), isopropyl (toxic), 2-pheoxyethanol (toxic), live viruses and a host of unknown components considered off-limits as trade secrets. These are just part of the vaccine mixture.

For those who believe there are elements in vaccines that may be responsible for the increased number of autism cases and other neurological disorders, thimerosal currently is at the top of the list of possible culprits being investigated.

Despite official insistence that the evidence linking injected thimerosal to autism is inconclusive, the data suggest otherwise. In 1999 the National Academy of Sciences Institute of Medicine, or IOM, must have thought there was something seriously wrong when it supported removal of thimerosal from vaccines, stating that it was “a prudent measure in support of the public goal to reduce mercury exposure of infants and children as much as possible.” The IOM further urged that “full consideration be given to removing thimerosal from any biological product to which infants, children and pregnant women are exposed.”

A recently published study in the Journal of American Physicians and Surgeons by Mark Geier, M.D., Ph.D., and president of the Genetic Centers of America and his son, David Geier, president of Medcon Inc. and a consultant on vaccine cases, was titled “Thimerosal in Childhood Vaccines, Neurodevelopment Disorders and Heart Disease in the United States.” It presents strong epidemiological evidence for a link between neurodevelopmental disorders and mercury exposure from thimerosal-containing childhood vaccines.

Specifically, the authors evaluated the doses of mercury that children received as part of their immunization schedule, then compared these doses with federal safety guidelines. Furthermore, to compare the effects of thimerosal in vaccine recipients, the incident rates of neurodevelopmental disorders and heart disease reported to the government’s Vaccine Adverse Events Reporting System were analyzed. The results were dramatic. The report revealed that “U.S. infants are exposed to mercury levels from their childhood-immunization schedule that far exceed the EPA [Environmental Protection Agency] and FDA [Food and Drug Administration]-established maximum permissible levels for the daily oral ingestion of methyl mercury.”

The authors concluded that “in light of voluminous literature supporting the biologic mechanisms for mercury-induced adverse reactions, the presence of amounts of mercury in thimerosal-containing childhood vaccines exceeding federal safety guidelines for the oral ingestion of mercury and previous epidemiological studies showing adverse reactions to such vaccines, a causal relationship between thimerosal-containing childhood vaccines and neurodevelopment disorders and heart disease appears to be confirmed.”

It is no secret among government and health officials that mercury is toxic and causes serious adverse reactions. In July 1999 the American Academy of Pediatrics and the U.S. Public Health Service issued a joint statement calling for the removal of thimerosal from vaccines. Five years after the joint statement, however, it still is difficult for parents and physicians to be sure that the pharmaceutical companies have indeed removed the toxic substance from their vaccines.

According to Mark Geier, “The 2003 Physicians’ Desk Reference, or PDR, still shows childhood vaccines containing thimerosal, including diphtheria, tetanus and acellular pertussis. DTaP, manufactured by Aventis Pasteur, contains 25µg [25 micrograms] of mercury, Hemophilus influenzae b (Hib) vaccine manufactured by Wyeth contains 25µg of mercury and pediatric Hepatitis B vaccine, manufactured by Merck, contains 12.5µg of mercury.”

Geier continues, “In addition, the influenza vaccine that is recommended for an increasing segment of the pediatric population in the U.S. also contains 25µg of mercury. Assuming that the labeling is correct, it is possible that children in the U.S. in 2003 may be exposed to levels of mercury from thimerosal contained in childhood vaccines that are at higher levels than at any time in the past. Possible total childhood mercury in 2003 is more than 300µg.”

Whether the “labeling is correct” is the question du jour. According to Len Lavenda, a spokesman for Aventis Pasteur, the maker of DTaP, “Aventis only sells the DTaP vaccine in the preservative-free formulation. The PDR references both the single and multidose. However, when we received the license for the preservative-free we ceased sales of the multidose vial. For some reason, the package insert takes much longer to revise than one would expect. I believe it is at the FDA waiting for approval, but the fact is we do not sell or market that product. In March 2001 we stopped all sales of that product in the preservative formulation. We did not recall the product at that time because it was our belief that if we did children may go unimmunized. It’s been two years since anyone has been able to purchase the preservative formulation from us.”

Lavenda continues: “The package insert talks about both the single and multidose vials and it says that the single-dose vial is preservative-free, and that is all that is sold. The PDR is outdated, but parents don’t have to worry about their children being administered 25µg of thimerosal. It just takes time to get the paperwork caught up. The current package insert does not accurately reflect what is being marketed.”

Geier is astounded by Lavenda’s admission. “If this is true, they should be in jail. They can’t have an insert on a drug that is totally wrong. It is against all regulations. If I’m a doctor and I’m giving you a shot and the insert says such and such is in the shot, it had better be in it. If doctors can’t rely on the instructions that come with what we’re injecting then all bets are off. This is a far worse admission than admitting that thimerosal is still in the vaccine. There are at least 15 laws that say the insert has to match what is in the product. This is absolutely horrendous. In my entire career in medicine I have never heard of a drug company claiming that what’s in the insert and the accompanying product don’t match. This is total mislabeling and fraud by their own admission. Legally they should be forced to close down because our clinical decisions are based on their labeling.”

Assuming that the package inserts are correct, Geier tells Insight, “The EPA limit is 0.1 micrograms of mercury per kilogram body weight per day. It doesn’t take a genius to do the calculations when on their day of birth children are given the hepatitis B vaccine, which is 12.5 micrograms of mercury. The average newborn weighs between 6 and 7 pounds, so they would be allowed 0.3 micrograms of mercury – but in this one shot they are getting 12.5 micrograms. That’s 39 times more than allowed by law. And it gets worse when you consider that children are getting multiple vaccinations at 2 months. And this limit is for oral ingestion and not injection, which is much worse.”

Rhonda Smith, a spokeswoman for the federal Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, tells Insight that, except for mere traces, thimerosal has been removed. “All routinely recommended licensed vaccines,” says Smith, “that are currently being manufactured for children in the U.S., except influenza, contain no thimerosal or only trace amounts - a concentration of less than 0.0002 percent.” But according to the 2003 immunization schedule and the package inserts, there appear to be a number of childhood vaccines that still contain mercury, including those for tetanus and diphtheria.

This scenario becomes even more bizarre when one further considers that thimerosal is not a necessary component in vaccines. It first was introduced by pharmaceutical giant Eli Lilly and Co. in the 1930s and is added to vaccines only as a preservative – the theory being that multiple doses are taken from the same bottle and that thimerosal will protect against contamination. However, according to Geier, “the solution to any such problem is to make vaccines available in a single dose, which will cost the pharmaceuticals about one penny more. What is interesting is that if you look up the mumps, measles, rubella [MMR] vaccines in the PDR you’ll see that they do not contain thimerosal because it would kill the live virus. The MMR is available in multidose packaging and, yet, there is no preservative – nothing. What they did was put a label on it that says ‘This product does not contain preservatives. Handle with care.’ It’s that simple.”

Geier insists, “I’m pro-vaccines, but the bottom line is that our kids are getting massive amounts of mercury. Mercury has been withdrawn from everything, including animal vaccines, yet we keep injecting it into our children. Everyone should absolutely refuse to take a vaccine shot that has thimerosal in it, and they should insist on reading the vaccine package insert. Our data showed that the more mercury children received in their childhood vaccines the more neurodevelopment disorders there are. We’ve looked at this every possible way and every time there’s massive evidence to support it.”

So, if everyone acknowledges the toxicity of mercury and top U.S. health officials have called for its removal, why is thimerosal still in vaccines?

“Maybe,” concludes Geier, “the mercury isn’t being taken out all at once because if the pharmaceutical companies did that you would see an unbelievable change in the rate of autism and there would be massive lawsuits. If you look at the graphs now they go up and up. If you stop the thimerosal all at once you’d see the numbers fall dramatically.”

Rep. Dan Burton, R-Ind., a longtime advocate for victims of autism, has a grandson who became autistic after receiving nine vaccines in one day. Burton recently sent his second request in as many years to the White House asking for a conference of scientists, researchers and parents to look into the causes of autism.

The Indiana lawmaker tells Insight, “There is no doubt in my mind that the mercury in vaccines is a major contributing factor to a growing number of neurological disorders among children, but in particular autism.”

Burton explains that “thimerosal is a toxic substance – mercury – and should not be put in close proximity of people, should not be injected into people, especially children who have a newly formed immune system that may not be able to handle it. To my knowledge there never have been long-term tests on thimerosal and we never should have used mercury in vaccines, period. Now what we’ve got is an epidemic that is absolutely out of control.”

The Indiana congressman continues, “One reason this isn’t getting the attention it needs is that the Food and Drug Administration has very close ties to the pharmaceutical companies, as does the Department of Health and Human Services [HHS] and the Centers for Disease Control. I’ve said in the past that in some cases it appears that it’s a revolving door and people leave government health agencies and go to work for the pharmaceuticals, which I think have undue influence on our health agencies. Of course, they may not want to look at this because there’s a possibility that large claims would be filed and the pharmaceutical companies would have to cough up the money to take care of these kids who have been damaged.”

Burton means business. He insists, “The FDA, CDC and HHS should put out in a very public way the dangers of mercury, but as soon as they do it will amount to an admission that their mercury is causing these problems. So the reports that come out of the FDA, CDC and HHS use ambiguous terms. Well, if they’re not sure, and there’s the remotest possibility that mercury in vaccines could cause autism, they ought to get thimerosal off the market. Too many kids are being ruined for life because of this stuff.”

Barbara Loe Fisher is founder of the National Vaccine Information Center, a charitable organization dedicated to the prevention of vaccine injuries and deaths through public education. Fisher tells Insight, “There are many things in vaccines that could be causing these disorders, and thimerosal is only part of the problem. In the last 20 years, we’ve gone from giving children 23 doses of seven vaccines to 38 doses of 12 vaccines. I think the mercury is part of it for some kids, though I’m not sure it’s the answer for all.” But this is a no-brainer, says Fisher. “Mercury shouldn’t be in vaccines. They’ve taken it out of everything else so why not the vaccines? The one thing that people really need to look at is the dramatic rise in chronic disease and disabilities in our kids in just the last two decades. You have to admit that there is something occurring that a growing number of children cannot get through without being immune-system and brain-system damaged. And what is the one thing that we expose every child to? Those vaccines.”

Fisher concludes, “I’ve always argued that public health is not measured only by an absence of infectious disease. It also is measured by the absence of chronic disease. By that score we get a big fat ‘F.’ So we don’t have measles and mumps, but look what we have now. It’s just really simple: Take the mercury out and let’s see what happens.”

Even so, based on the Aventis admission that the package insert does not reflect what is in the vaccine, it will be difficult to know when, if ever, the thimerosal actually has been removed. This skews the data about the relationship between thimerosal and autism. More important, it means parents cannot be sure the vaccinations their children receive are free of mercury.

Neither the Wyeth nor Merck pharmaceutical companies, nor HHS or FDA, returned Insight’s calls about this matter.

Next Page »

The Holmes Blog